Iran nuclear situation - U.S. and Britain have stopwatch running
(12.08.2005)

As diplomats try to encourage Iran to abandon its nuclear ambitions, the U.S. and Britain are keen to put a time limit on the proceedings.

Whilst Tehran have rejected the IAEA resolution and have resumed its nuclear activities, some still believe that a settlement is possible.

However, as the U.S. and Britain (mainly Tony Blair and Bush) are not interested in whether Iran stop their nuclear program or not, they are trying to force the situation by trying to get the UN to place a time limit on events. But other countries, that include Brazil and India have objected to this.

Claims that Iran are close to producing a nuclear weapon have changed in the last year. This estimate has fallen from about 10 years, to 5 years, to 2 years and in some recent reports they may be only a few months away (or already have a nuclear bomb).

Most experts believe that Iran are many years away from obtaining a nuclear weapon, so what is the rush? Why are the U.S. and Britain (the one's that support the Middle Eastern wars the most), the two main countries trying to place a time limit on the talks?

This can be answered very easily. Iraq had no WMD (weapons of mass destruction), but the world was led to believe they had. Iran, like Iraq, is the target of an attack and a timetable has already been set for this. A number of events have already taken place that are the foundations of this future attack and more are on their way. Those planning Iran's fate do not want delays and distractions, the event has already been postponed once and those responsible are growing impatient.

Iran obviously knows that whatever they do, it will make no difference to what will be. The talks will provide no solution because a series of events (for which they will be blamed for) will cancel out any agreements that they make.

In a few weeks from now, the world will witness history repeating itself.

News Feed