If Ron Paul became President, how long would 'they'
let him survive?
(25-11-2011)
There
seems to be no doubt that Ron Paul is one of the most honest politicians
in the US, if not the world. His ideas are simple and very sensible,
and his leadership would bring about the greatest change to the United
States in a very long time, not just helping the American people,
but having a positive effect on the entire world.
Unfortunately, as was the case in his last attempt,
the media are hiding his successes in the polls and giving him less
public exposure than his rivals. He is effectively playing in a game
where the dice are loaded, so the chances of getting his message to
the entire nation are slim at best. And even when he does appear on
TV, he usually has to battle with some newsreader that is determined
to 'twist' his ideas around and make them look Un-American.
Nobody could be more 'American' than Ron Paul, a politician
that really does care for his country and the people. Unfortunately,
the American public have been brainwashed into accepting a new kind
of America, one that allows its government to send troops to far off
lands to secure deals for oil companies. These are 'invasions' and
not to defend the United States of America (as Obama mentioned in
his Thanksgiving speech). Ron Paul wants to bring the troops home!
And did you notice that 'God' was not mentioned in the
Thanksgiving address? We are told that this is to make the occasion
more welcoming to a wider audience (of all religions). Do other countries
'adjust' their religious ceremonies in this way? Of course not and
why should they? Thanksgiving, just like Christmas, is connected with
Christianity and for Christians. Other religions have their own special
events, which are celebrated in different ways and at different times.
They should all be respected as individual events, but it seems 'God'
has become a dirty word in some people's book.
And who are the people that decide you must say "Happy
Holidays" instead of Merry Christmas, and ban 'God' from the
Thanksgiving address? The same people that don't want to see Ron Paul
become President!
Some 2,000 years ago (according to the history books)
a man called Caiaphas, who was a supreme political operator and one
of the most influential men in Jerusalem, sentenced Jesus to death.
His crime was being too popular with the people and highlighting the
many wrongs that were taking place in the establishment.
Caiaphas was one of 71 members (moneychangers) of the
council that worked closely with the Romans. Whilst the Romans were
their bosses, Caiaphas and his members had created a situation within
the organization that had benefit to the Romans, but made them a lot
of money as well. The only way to safeguard their business was to
kill Jesus.
Whilst I do not wish to offend anyone by likening Ron
Paul to Jesus, he is effectively trying to do much the same thing.
Ron Paul would like to see the Federal Reserve lose much of its power
(if not close it down altogether) and the modern day 'moneychangers'
are not going to allow that. The last President that showed an interest
in doing that was assassinated (JFK) and we can only speculate on
who was responsible for his murder.
Caiaphas may have a different name today, but very little
else has changed. Whilst I would love to see Ron Paul become President
(along with millions of others), I fear that such a success could
prove costly in other ways. He is too nice a guy to meet that sort
of fate, and would his Vice President and administration share his
passion and bravery?
Clearly something must be done, and perhaps a landslide
victory for Ron Paul next year would help. This would show that the
American public are united in their wish to see some 'real' change
and provide encouragement to others in seeing these changes are achieved.
The clock is ticking and the time is right. This opportunity
may never come again, or a politician like Ron Paul.