More evidence to support solar activity and Global Warming
(02.02.2006)

Following a recent claim that 2005 may have been the hottest year on record, there are still quite a few people clinging to the belief that Global Warming is nothing to worry about, with scientists splitting hairs about whether last year was actually hotter than 1998.

Are some scientists more interested in scoring technical points on the issue of Global Warming, or are they prepared to accept that there is a problem and try and do something about it?

Nine of the hottest years have occured in the last ten years which seems to indicate a problem that is getting worse more quickly. The melting ice and vanishing glaciers are not just some scientific prediction, they are a reality. But still there are doubts. Do some people not listen to the news, or are they completely stupid?

From some reports, it would seem that some scientists don't really know what is happening and they all seem to be making guesses with different data.

In an article from livescience.com in May 2005, the following information was published:

Reports in the late 1980s found the amount of sunlight reaching the planet's surface had declined by 4 to 6 percent since 1960. Suddenly, around 1990, that appears to have reversed.

"When we looked at the more recent data, lo and behold, the trend went the other way," said Charles Long, senior scientist at the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Long participated in one of two studies that uncovered this recent trend using satellite data and ground-based monitoring. Both studies are detailed in the May 6 issue of the journal Science.
A third study in the journal this week, tackling a related aspect of all this, finds that Earth has reflected more sunlight back into space from 2000 to 2004 than in years prior. However, a similar investigation last year found just the opposite. A lack of data suggests it's impossible to know which study is right.
The bottom line, according to a group of experts not involved in any of these studies: Scientists don't know much about how sunlight interacts with our planet, and until they understand it, they can't accurately predict any possible effects of human activity on climate change.

We believe that certain people do know what is causing the Global Warming affect on our planet (and all the other planets in our system) and this is an event that is taking place in our system (perhaps the early signs of a Galactic Superwave?). You may have noticed that many craft designed to study the effects of climate change on our planet and in space have developed problems before or after the launch (this applies to existing craft already in orbit). Here is another extract from the same livescience article:

Plans and missions designed to study the effects of clouds and aerosols have been delayed or cancelled, Charlson and his colleagues write.
To properly study albedo, scientists want to put a craft about 1 million miles out in space at a point were it would orbit the Sun while constantly monitoring Earth.
The satellite, called Deep Space Climate Observatory, was once scheduled for launch from a space shuttle in 2000 but has never gotten off the ground. Two other Earth-orbiting satellites that would study the albedo have been built but don't have launch dates. And recent budget shifts at NASA and other agencies have meant some data that's available is not being analyzed, Charlson and his colleagues contend.

Surely, such an important problem should be given priority, but maybe no further study is needed, if you already know what's coming, and the less people who know about it the better?

We have already reported that the "Chemtrails" many have seen "clouding" the skies is an attempt to block the solar rays creating the current increase in temperatures. You may find another article from livescience of interest, published in June 2005. Space Ring Could Shade Earth and Stop Global Warming

A wild idea to combat global warming suggests creating an artificial ring of small particles or spacecrafts around Earth to shade the tropics and moderate climate extremes.
There would be side effects, proponents admit. An effective sunlight-scattering particle ring would illuminate our night sky as much as the full Moon, for example.
And the price tag would knock the socks off even a big-budget agency like NASA: $6 trillion to $200 trillion for the particle approach. Deploying tiny spacecraft would come at a relative bargain: a mere $500 billion tops.
But the idea, detailed today in the online version of the journal Acta Astronautica, illustrates that climate change can be battled with new technologies, according to one scientist not involved in the new work.
"Reducing solar insolation by 1.6 percent should overcome a 1.75 K [3 degrees Fahrenheit] temperature rise," contends a group led by Jerome Pearson, president of Star Technology and Research, Inc. "This might be accomplished by a variety of terrestrial or space systems."
The power of scattering sunlight has been illustrated naturally, the scientists note. Volcanic eruptions, such as that of Mt. Pinatubo in 1991, pumped aerosols into the atmosphere and cooled the global climate by about a degree. Other researchers have suggested such schemes as adding metallic dust to smoke stacks, to flood the atmosphere and reflect more sunlight back into space.
In the newly outlined approach, reflective particles might come from the mining of Earth, the Moon or asteroids. They'd be put into orbit around the equator. Alternately, tiny micro-spacecraft could be deployed with reflective umbrellas.
A ring created by a batch of either "shades the tropics primarily, providing maximum effectiveness in cooling the warmest parts of our planet," the scientists write. An early version of their idea was presented but not widely noticed in 2002.

In the above extract it mentions "adding metallic dust to smoke stacks" and many will know already that Chemtrails contain metallic compounds (Aluminium and Barium). This is not some Sci-Fi idea for the future, it is happening right now and has been for at least 7 years!

Our planet is in serious trouble, but those who already know that are keeping that information to themselves. The scientists who can't see the problem, probably find it just as difficult to boil an egg. As for most of the public, they will continue to believe whatever story is easier on their minds, instead of making some effort to study the information for themselves.

Some of us are prepared for what is coming, you can be too. For more information on this subject and links to other articles, please check out our earlier article Here

Do you have a comment to make on this article or other topics? Visit our Forum and post your opinion now.

News Feed